Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 81:1026-1027, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2009159

RESUMEN

Background: Autoinfammatory diseases (AID) are characterized by severe systemic and organ infammation as well as high burden of disease for patients and their families. Treatment with the monoclonal antibody canakinumab (CAN), an interleukin-1β inhibitor, has been proven to be safe and effective in clinical trials and real-life. Objectives: The present study explores the long-term efficacy and safety of CAN in routine clinical practice conditions in pediatric (age ≥2 years) and adult patients with CAPS (cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes), FMF (familial Mediterranean fever), TRAPS (tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome) and HIDS/MKD (hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome/meva-lonate kinase defciency). Methods: RELIANCE is a prospective, non-interventional, observational study based in Germany. Patients with clinically confrmed diagnoses of AID routinely receiving CAN are enrolled. Besides efficacy parameters regarding disease activity and remission, safety parameters were recorded at baseline and assessed at 6-monthly intervals. Results: Here, we present the interim analysis of patients with AID (N=199) enrolled in the RELIANCE Registry between October 2017 and December 2021. Mean age in this cohort was 24.4 years (2-79 years) and the proportion of female patients was 53% (N=104). At baseline, median duration of prior CAN treatment was 2 years (0-12 years). A total of 123 patients (62%) experienced any AE (N=653) among which naso-pharyngitis, increase of infammatory markers and pyrexia were the most frequent AE with incidence rates per 100 patient years (IR) of 8.3, 6.2, and 6.2, respectively. 29 patients (15%) were affected by severe AE (SAE, total number N=90) including 11 patients (6%) with SAE suspected to be drug-related (SADR;total number N=30) with IR from 0.2 to 0.7 (Table 1). Overall, 16 AE comprised upper respiratory tract infections (URI). One death (COVID-19, not related) and one malignancy (skin papilloma, not related) were reported. No vertigo and no hyper-sensitivity reactions were observed. N=10 (IR 2.36) vaccination reactions were reported (no SAE). Conclusion: The interim data from the RELIANCE study, the longest running real-life canakinumab registry, confrm safety of long-term canakinumab treatment across the entire study population. A trend for dose-related increase of SAE/SADR requires continuous close monitoring and awareness in patient groups (children, severe phenotypes, certain genotypes) requiring greater than standard dose treatment regimens.

2.
Respir Med Res ; 79: 100828, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1237866

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic. In absence of official recommendations, implementing daily multidisciplinary team (MDT) COVID-19 meetings was urgently needed. Our aim was to describe our initial institutional standard operating procedures for implementing these meetings, and their impact on daily practice. METHODS: All consecutive patients who were hospitalized in our institution due to COVID 19, from March 31 to April 15, 2020, were included. Criteria to be presented at MDT meetings were defined as a proven COVID-19 by PCR or strongly suspected on CT scan, requiring hospitalization and treatment not included in the standard of care. Three investigators identified the patients who met the predefined criteria and compared the treatment and outcomes of patients with predefined criteria that were presented during MDT meeting with those not presented during MDT meeting. COVID-19 MDT meeting implementation and adhesion were also assessed by a hospital medical staff survey. RESULTS: In all, 318 patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 were examined in our hospital. Of these, 230 (87%) were hospitalized in a COVID-19 unit, 91 (40%) of whom met predefined MDT meeting criteria. Fifty (55%) patients were presented at a MDT meeting versus 41 (45%) were not. Complementary exploration and inclusion in the CorImmuno cohort were higher in MDT meeting group (respectively 35 vs. 15%, P=0.03 and 80 versus 49%, P=0.0007). Prescription of hydrocortisone hemisuccinate was higher in group of patients not presented during MDT meeting (24 vs. 51%, P=0.007). Almost half of the patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were not presented at MDT meeting, which can be partly explained by technical software issues. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary COVID-19 meetings helped implementing a single standard of care, avoided using treatments that were untested or currently being tested, and facilitated the inclusion of patients in prospective cohorts and therapeutic trials.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Procesos de Grupo , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Nivel de Atención , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Francia , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA